ANALYZING PERSUASIVE APPEALS IN
ADVERTISEMENTS: 2002
(selections from analyses written by Rhetoric students in spring 2002*)
ASSIGNMENT:
"Compose a cogent rhetorical analysis of a magazine ad of your choosing.
(Examples of such analyses are posted at Analyzing Persuasive Appeals in
Advertisements: 2000.) Bring to class both your word-processed
analysis (roughly 300-400 words) and the ad you've examined. " Analyses of ads
that did not contain both images and text (as instructed in class) were not considered for
this page, nor were those that were handwritten or short or turned in late. That
said, some fine analyses were left off this page simple because of space limitations.
* Some of the analyses below have been edited for conciseness (omitted
material is indicated by ellipsis marks); some have been copyedited to correct errors of
grammar, punctuation, and spelling (for instance, the vague use of "this,"
inconsistent tense, indefinite pronoun reference, misuse of relative pronouns,
misplacement of commas and periods outside quotation marks, and other
infelicities). Please notify me if any fresh errors have crept in while
transcribing the texts. The analyses are arranged alphabetically by the name of the
product advertised.
Contents
Advil (Emily
Joost)
Bravada (Cedric
Saxton)
Eucerin (Eric
Verhine)
Goodnites (Tim
Witherow)
GranGala (Harris
Lewis)
Hydroxycut (Amy
Murphy)
MSN (Ryan Clark)
Proactiv (Ann
Belue)
Roxio (Melissa Hill)
Target (Becky Swart)
Ad Analyses: 2000
Click on the small image of each ad to see a larger version.
English 5730 is taught by Dr. Richard Nordquist.
Armstrong Atlantic State University
Savannah, Georgia 31419
912/921 5991
e-mail: chiasmus@netzero.com

07 January 2003