
Rhetorical Competition #1:
Neutering Exercise
(Spring 2005)
Instructions: Read all of your
classmates' contributions to this semester's NEUTERING PROJECT. Then, no
later than 5:00 on Friday Sunday, February 11 13, send me a brief e-mail in which you:
(1) cast your vote for the one neutering exercise from our class that you
think most effectively and imaginatively responds to the guidelines for the assignment
(see below); and
(2) provide a short (one- or two-sentence) justification for your choice--keeping in mind
that the primary purpose of the exercise was to reveal the ways in which altering the
style of a text also affects both its meaning and the reader's response. (The
"moral" of the exercise appears in a note to the Spring 2002 Neutering Project.)
Votes and comments on your classmates' neutralized texts appear below.
Final voting results
appear below your comments.
Guidelines for this exercise are posted at ASSIGNMENTS for Feb. 2.:
"By now you have selected a short memorable text of any sort (a poem, a song lyric,
an excerpt from a story or poem). Your challenge is to attempt to strip the text
down to its basic meanings, rewriting it in the most neutral style you can manage.
As we'll see, eliminating style is impossible, but for this exercise you will attempt
to do so."
Neutering Exercise (Spring 2005)
Neutralizing Exercises have been posted in the order in which they were
received.
In several cases, original formatting has been lost, and texts get a little messy.
Sorry!
-Emily Dickinson, Poem 199
(Christi Healan)
-Wordsworth, "The Idiot
Boy" (tsupon21@comcast.net)
-Countee Cullen, "Yet Do I
Marvel" (Heather Glover)
-Sylvia Plath, "Tulips"
(Pamela Melton)
-Shakespeare, excerpt from King
Henry V (Arthur Tanney)
-E. A. Poe, "The Raven"
(Shelley Rhodes)
-Jim Morrison, "Ghost
Song" (Oakley Julian)
-Bruce Springsteen, "Thunder
Road" (Kirstin Mullis)
-Elizabeth Bishop, "One
Art" (Alicia Ferrell)
-Avril Lavigne, "I'm with
You" (Robtheringwraith@aol.com)
-The Pixies, "Nimrod's
Son" (Patrice Beavers)
-"Mary Had a Little
Lamb" (Kasey Ray)
-Andrew Marvell, "To His Coy
Mistress" (Katie Sanders)
-Incubus, "Drive"
(Dee Dee Coursey)
-John Keats, "Ode to a
Nightingale" (Chris McCormick)
-REO Speedwagon, "Can't
Fight This Feeling" (Kelley Sanders)
-Shakespeare, Sonnet 18
(Jolene Burge)
-William Blake, "The
Tyger" (Chris Shirley)
-Darrell Orrell,
"Baptism" (Ariana Siennick)
final update 13 February 2005
(9:30 p.m.)
VOTES & COMMENTS
- I cast my vote for Arthur's version of the
Crispin's Day Speech. Although his version contained a style,
he came as close as I have ever seen to having no style. I would have never
gone to war for Arthur. By the way, I do not feel that I was influenced in any way
by your presentation of Arthur's work.
- I would like to vote for Oakley Julians neutering on
Jim Morrisons Ghost Song.
Her neutering of the text makes it sound strange and absurd (much different from
Morrisons rendition). If The
Doors lyrics had been that neutered, they would not be remembered today.
- I am casting my vote for the best neutered assignment to Christi Healan and her attempt to
revise Emily Dickinson's Poem 199. I think she does an excellent job in
really breaking down what Emily Dickinson is saying in her poem. After reading Christi's
revision it really helped me to understand exactly what Emily Dickinson was saying about
being a wife. Christi does a good job at explaining and comparing the single life of the
woman in contrast to the married wife. In the short few words that Emily Dickinson uses in
this short poem Christi just does a great job of pulling everything out that she can to
help the reader better understand it.
- I chose REO Speedwagon,
"Can't Fight This Feeling" by Kelley Sanders because her neuter had
more of an _expressional feeling. She understood the underlining of the song,
but formed it in words that probably made more sense to her adn to the rest of us.
The neutered text was an emotional one.
- My vote for the number one Rhetoric Excercise goes to Alicia for her neutralizing of
Elizabeth Bishop's "One Art." I like the way she
made the poem into a "life lesson" for the reader. Alicia's
"neutered" version still retains the gentle qualities of the original and
conveys the message very clearly. Great job!
- There were several examples that i liked, (Katie's and Rob's) but i have to cast my
vote for Arthur's nice
piece of monotonous drone. I was reminded of the teacher in Ferris Bueller's
Day Off: the monotone voice with no emotion. Very funny.
- I seem to have taken a liking to Jolene Burge's Neutering of
Shakespeare's Sonnet 18. This is as plain and simple as I have ever seen
Shakepeare. It strips this well-known sonnet down to its core and leaves us with the bare
necessities. *** As a side note, I would like to propose that Chris Shirley be
tarred and feathered (not to mention receive a grade deduction) for making the rest of us
look bad.
- I cast a vote for Kirstin
Mullis [neutering of Springsteen's "Thunder Road"] because I
think she really understood the song and the meaning behind the words. Her neuter
version refects what the song is all about and it describes the scene and moment
perfectly.
- My vote goes to Kelly
Sanders and "can't fight this feeling". I like how Kelly kept
repeating the "I love you" phrase and "love" although neither the word
nor the phrase exists in the original. The repetition made the text seem monotonous. The
overuse cheapens not only the word but all the metaphoric language in the song. Because
she was consistent in her neutered text with the use of love, I thought that it
neutralized any power the original text had. The neutralized text is not persuasive
because it has reduced the original text to a cheesy song, which is what it basically is.
Although the rest of the class (including myself) had great examples, I thought
"can't fight this feeling" was the best.
- My vote is for Kelly's
version of REO Speedwagen. I think that she did a great job trying to make a
sappy love song not so sappy. However, I don't think that her version would have been a
hit song.
- Of the ones posted, the one I thought was best was Arthur Tanny's "St.
Crispian" speech. It is very deadpan and comes across very textbook and
pedantic. All of the beauty of the speech is translated into banal language.
- I was impressed by several entries, among them Heather Glover's revision of
"Yet do I Marvel" because she added a nice touch that I noticed several
others (including myself) did not, which was to neuter the title as well as the text.
However, I'm voting for Kirtin
Mullis' Rumble Path version of Springteen's Thunder Road. After
re-reading it, I still laughed (lines like "toss flowers in the precipitation"
and "flattened out there
like a murderer in the flaming gasball" are among the best!). As a
music fan, I was somewhat appalled at how she was able to take a song of youthful passion
and rebellion (an anthem for many during its time) and make it so silly and
meaningless...I personally will hear lyrics with a different ear now.
This is also the kind of neutering that I imagine would make the spin doctors of the
world cringe in horror.
- Hmmm. Well, I thought Arthur
Tanney did a great job of neutralizing Shakespeare's King Henry V's speech.
His "politically correct" word choice downsized the speech from what was an
invigorating rally to war, or even a sarcastic pep talk, to an emotionless matter-of-fact
statement that can only be rivaled by a politician.
- After careful deliberation, I am casting my vote with Rob, who neutered "I'm
With You" by Avril Lavigne. I think Rob maintains the meaning
but completely removes the pop-princess fluff from this song, making it so condensed
and boring that it feels less like a song and more like a hurriedly-scrawled suicide
note from someone so pitiful you wish she would go off with the stranger and
never, ever come back (of course, I'm not an Avril fan, so I already wish she would go off
and never, ever come back).
- I believe Christi Healan did a great job on Emily Dickinson's Poem 199.
While many of the neutering exercises shortened the original pieces by eliminating flowery
language, Christi lengthens Dickinson's work to fully convey the meaning; I imagine
this was a more difficult task. I think she does a good job of eliminating (or distorting)
the emotions inherent in the poem. *** On a side note - I liked Chris
Shirley's neutering of "Tiger, Tiger."
- Originally I was going to vote for Patrice Beavers' example because
I did not want to seem like I was voting only on our class experience. However, I have
decided that instead I will vote for Arthur Tanney's example.
It is just so outrageously funny and insulting to the original that it deserves my vote.
- After reading all
entries twice, Arthurs
selection of the St. Crispins Day speech made for an excellent
neutering. I liked how his careful choice of pronouns depersonalized the text.
- I
am not sure (aporia) which one I like more, they are all so good. I mean, look at Keats and Marvell and Poe (polysendentic tricolon). OK,
sorry; I'm done now. I am gonna go with -Andrew Marvell, "To His
Coy Mistress" (Katie Sanders). The reason is that she fulfilled the
assignment and did so very well. I narrowed down all the pieces I liked because they
actually did the assignment, specifically did the assignment well and without skipping
lines (many people did good jobs on the lines they did, but skipped much). Once I had all
the ones I liked, hers was the best combiniation of a good job with a good choice.
________________________________________________________
RESULTS
Winner. The top vote-getter
(with six votes) is Arthur
Tanney's neutering of the St. Crispin's Day speech from Shakespeare's Henry V
(
).
Honorable Mentions. Other recipients of multiple votes
include Kelley Sanders' version
of "Can't Fight This Feeling" (3 votes
), Christi Healan's version of Emily
Dickinson's Poem 199 (2), and Kirstin
Mullis's version of "Thunder Road" (2
). The fact
that more than of half of the the contributions received at least one vote is evidence of
the generally high quality of the exercises and the generally thoughtful quality of your
evaluations. And the fact that nobody voted hor his or her own contribution is a
testament to your sense of honor and good will. Though not all of the exercises
follow the guidelines, most demonstrate an awareness that style is far more than word
choice.
In conclusion, while the style of a text may be transformed, ultimately it cannot be
wholly neutered (or neutralized)--though many of you gave it a good try. Excellent
work overall.
Return to Rhetoric home page.