ENGLISH 5730 U/G |
|
FINAL
PROJECT GUIDELINES
|
.
6 May 2008 (Tuesday)
--Final Exam.
Meet at 4:00 in Solms 207 to take the
final exam. Bring along pens and paper. Answer key to the exam will be posted here on
Tuesday evening. There are no make-up exams in rhetoric.
1 May 2008 (Thursday)
--Final
Project. No later than 6:00 p.m., drop your
final project (in an envelope with your name on the outside) into the gray box on the
counter in Solms 211.
29 April 2008 (Tuesday)
--Handouts. Re-read
carefully (and bring to class) this handout:
"The Catbird Seat," by
James Thurber
--Classical
Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Review
key sections assigned since the start of the semester:
pp. 1-26
pp. 52-88
pp. 256-292
pp. 349-351; 377-411
pp. 459-472
pp. 492-507; 509-511; and 526-543
--READINGS in Thank You for Arguing: Review key
chapters assigned since the start of the semester:
Chapter 3 (pp. 27-37)
Chapter 4 (pp. 38-44)
Chapter 5 (pp. 46-55)
Chapter 6 (pp. 56-65)
Chapter 7 (pp. 66-71)
Chapter 8 (pp. 72-78)
Chapter 9 (pp. 79-90)
Chapter 12 (pp. 108-120)
Chapter 13 (pp. 121-133)
Chapter 14 (pp. 137-154)
Chapter 20 (pp. 208-225)
Chapter 21 (pp. 226-236)
Chapter 23 (pp. 247-259)
Appendix I (pp. 287-296) and Appendix III (pp. 303-305)
--RHETORICAL TERMS: Review all
terms in our glossary.
22 April 2008 (Tuesday)
--Handouts. Read or
re-read carefully (and bring to class) these handouts:
-"In Bed," by Joan Didion
-"The Endless Streetcar Ride into the Night and the Tinfoil Noose," by Jean
Shepherd
-"The Catbird Seat," by James Thurber
-Rhetoric Timeline: 19th Century to 21st Century
--Online Readings. Read (or
reread), squeeze, and bring printouts to class:
-"Goodbye to All That,"
by Joan Didion (read all:
squeeze opening four paragraphs and closing four paragraphs)
-Ecclesiastes
(King James version of the Bible), Chapters 1-9
--READINGS in Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Read pp. 526-543 of "A Survey of Rhetoric."
--READINGS in Thank
You for Arguing:
Read: Appendix I (pp. 287-296) and Appendix III (pp. 303-305)
15 April 2008 (Tuesday)
--FINAL
PROJECT. Project guidelines were posted on March 20. The deadline for choosing a short
text (or a relatively short excerpt from a longer text) and submitting project topics and
texts was April 8. Unfortunately, a few of you have selected texts that are
problematical--too short, too long, in translation, and/or unidentified. It would have
been wise to have consulted with me about your topic before the deadline. Please don't
compound the problem by putting off getting to work on the project. This would be a good
week to start submitting rough drafts (or partial drafts) for feedback. The closer we get
to the end of term, the less time I'll have available to respond to your drafts.
--Handouts. Read or re-read
carefully (and bring to class) these handouts:
-"In Bed," by Joan Didion
-"An Appeal for the Final Battle of the American Revolution" (Karen Farmer's
rhetorical analysis of John Quincy Adams's speech in the film Amistad)
-"Supreme Court opinions on Lee v. Weisman"
-Audre Lorde's "The Master's Tools"
--Online Readings. Read, squeeze,
and bring printouts to class:
-"Of Studies,"
by Francis Bacon (click on "print" button for a version of the page without
ads)
-"Goodbye to All That,"
by Joan Didion (read all:
squeeze opening four paragraphs and closing four paragraphs)
-Ecclesiastes
(King James version of the Bible), Chapters 1-9
--Online Speeches. Read, view, listen (click on
the "audio mp3" link or the play button under the image on each page):
-John
Quincy Adams Addresses the Supreme Court (in conjunction with Karen Farmer's analysis,
above)
-Branagh's
version of St. Crispin's Day speech from Henry V (in conjunction with handout
and with Olivier version seen in class)
-Kennedy's Inaugural
Address (in conjunction with last week's assigned reading in Classical Rhetoric)
-Atticus
Finch's closing argument from To Kill a Mockingbird (in conjunction with this
week's assigned reading from Classical Rhetoric--specifically, pp. 285-287)
-Ronald Reagan's
Speech in West Berlin (in preparation for a student's analysis of the speech that I'll
be handing out in class this week)
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student:
(1) Carefully re-read pp. 62-71 ("The
Fallacies");
(2) Carefully re-read pp. 278-292 (refutation and conclusion of speech)
8 April 2008 (Tuesday)
--FINAL
PROJECT. Turn in a photocopy of the text you'll be analyzing for your final project.
--Handouts. Read carefully (and bring to class) the handouts distributed on April 3:
-"Till Lunch Do Us Part," by Tom Robbins
-"Supreme Court opinions on Lee v. Weisman"
-Audre Lorde's "The Master's Tools"
Re-read (carefully) the student papers on Chopin's "The Storm" and
Twain's "Littery Folk"
--Classical
Rhetoric for the Modern Student:
(1) Carefully read pp. 62-71 ("The Fallacies");
(2) In "A Survey of Rhetoric," read about Francis Bacon and the Royal Society
(pp. 506-507 and pp. 509-511);
(3) JFK's Inaugural Address, followed by rhetorical analysis (pp. 459-472).
--EULOGIES (online).
Read, listen to, and quickly squeeze (i.e., spend
five to ten minutes analyzing before class) each of these eulogies:
-Robert Kennedy's Eulogy for Dr. King (text and audio)
-John Cleese's Eulogy for Graham Chapman (full text; partial audio and video clip)
-Reagan's Eulogy for the Challenger Crew (text, audio,
and video)
And remember to bring copies of the texts to class on Tuesday.
1 April 2008 (Tuesday)
--GUIDELINES
FOR FINAL PROJECT. By now you've carefully read the guidelines and begun considering
possible topics for your final project. Once you've spent some time squeezing a potential
topic (as discussed in class), send me your topic idea (with text linked or attached to
your email--or dropped off as a hard copy) so that I can offer a little advice well before
the topic-submission deadline of April 8.
--Handout. Read carefully pages 3-6 of the handout distributed on March 27,
"Isn't It Ironic?" Know the definitions of irony, the various types of
irony discussed by different writers, the origins of the term and the concept, and
contemporary uses (and attitudes toward) irony.
--Online Readings (and
Re-Readings):
-"A Modest Proposal," by
Jonathan Swift (bring printout to class)
-"The
Story of an Hour," by Kate Chopin
-"The
Storm," by Kate Chopin
Be sure to bring printouts of all three readings to class and be prepared to discuss.
--Classical
Rhetoric for the Modern Student: Carefully re-read pp. 52-62 (enthymemes
and examples) and pp. 497-505 (rhetoric in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance).
--Thank You for Arguing. Re-read carefully (by Thursday, April 3):
Chapter 13: Control the Argument (pp. 121-133)
Chapter 14: Spot Fallacies (pp. 137-154)
25 March 2008 (Tuesday)
--MIDTERM
REVIEW. Make
sure that you've reviewed the SAMPLE
STUDENT ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON
PART A OF THE MIDTERM and the SAMPLE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON PART
C OF THE MIDTERM. Answers will be taken down on April 6.
--GUIDELINES FOR FINAL PROJECT. Read
the guidelines carefully, and begin considering possible topics for your final project.
--Thank You for Arguing. Read carefully:
Chapter 13: Control the Argument (pp. 121-133)
Chapter 14: Spot Fallacies (pp. 137-154)
--Classical Rhetoric for the
Modern Student: Carefully read pp. 52-62 (enthymemes and
examples) and pp. 497-505 (rhetoric in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance).
--Online Readings:
-"The Tell-Tale Heart,"
by Edgar Allan Poe (bring printout to class)
-"A Modest Proposal," by
Jonathan Swift (print out, read carefully, take notes, and bring to class)
-Prof.
Ed. Lamoreaux's notes on Renaissance
Rhetoric
-Christine de Pizan (at
Wikipedia)
-Copia:
Foundations of the Abundant Style (at Wikipedia)
--Handout. Read carefully:
Page 1 and pp. 5-9 of "Frantic Forensic Oratory: Poe's 'The Tell-Tale
Heart'"
18 and 20 March 2008 (Tuesday/Thursday)
--MIDTERM EXAM. Visit
the EXAMINATIONS page for an outline
of the midterm exam, study tips, and sample questions and answers. To contribute exam
questions and help your classmates review for the exam, post sample Q&A at the course bulletin board.
11 and 13 March 2008 (Tuesday/Thursday)
--SPRING
BREAK. Review for the midterm exam.
4 March 2008 (Tuesday)
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student: Carefully review
pp. 256-276 (discussions of the exordium and narratio) and carefully read pp. 276-292
(confirmation, refutation, and conclusion) in Part III, "Arrangement of
Material."
--Thank You for Arguing.
Review Chapter 8, pp. 72-78 ("Win Their Trust").
--Online Readings: Essays & Essay
Analysis. Read carefully and bring copies to class:
-"A Hanging," by George
Orwell
-"The Ring of Time," by E.B.
White
-"Rhetorical Analysis of the 'The Ring of Time'"
--Online Readings:
Terms. Review carefully--and know the terms:
-From
Accismus to Zeugma: 20 Rhetorical Terms You Never Learned in School
-Effective
Rhetorical Strategies of Repetition
-What is a maxim (aka proverb)?
-What is a
metaphor?
-What is aporia?
-What is
invective?
-What are the
progymnasmata?
--Handouts. Read
and know:
-excerpts from "Give a Great Speech"
-excerpts from "Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream': Ceremonial Protest and
African American Jeremiad"
--Evaluating
Examples of Rhetorical Terms: H-Z.
Review all the examples
of rhetorical terms H-Z that
were submitted by the 4:30 deadline this past Tuesday by you and your classmates. As
you read, make special note of:
(a) PUZZLERS: i.e., examples that puzzle or
confuse you for any reason or that raise questions about the meaning of the terms they are
meant to illustrate; and
(b) STANDOUTS: examples that you consider to
be especially clear, fresh, useful, imaginative, and appropriate--in other words, examples
that follow the assignment guidelines (see below, Feb. 26) and that help
you to understand and remember the terms they illustrate.
After you have reviewed all of the
posted examples for terms H-Z, select:
(a) your top two puzzlers (i.e., the examples that seem
to cause the most uncertainty or confusion--not necessarily the most obvious or
trite or unnecessary examples, but those that serve, intentionally or not, the useful
purpose of raising questions about the meanings of the terms they're meant to illustrate),
and
(b) your top three standouts (i.e., the examples that
you think are the best of the best, according to the criteria above).
In no more than a sentence or two for each, prepare to explain (a) why or how the puzzlers puzzle you and (b) why your top three standouts are so darn
good. (Note: for both
puzzlers and standouts, you may call attention to your own examples as well as those of
your classmates.) For examples of puzzlers and standouts identified by students in last
fall's class, see the italicized comments at Rhetorical Terms with Examples: Fall
2007 (A-H).
No later than 4:30 this afternoon (Tuesday, March 4), send your nominations (two puzzlers and three standouts) plus brief
explanations for each to the course email address: engl5730@lycos.com. As always,
please send your responses both attached as a Word doc and pasted
into your e-mail message. If you would like credit for completing
this stage of the exercise, please include your name.
28 February 2008 (Thursday)
--Evaluating
Examples of Rhetorical Terms: A-G.
Review all the examples
of rhetorical terms A-G that were
submitted last week by you and your classmates. As you read, make special note of:
(a) PUZZLERS: i.e., examples that puzzle or
confuse you for any reason or that raise questions about the meaning of the terms they are
meant to illustrate; and
(b) STANDOUTS: examples that you consider to
be especially clear, fresh, useful, imaginative, and appropriate--in other words, examples
that follow the assignment guidelines (see below, Feb. 19) and that help
you to understand and remember the terms they illustrate.
After you have reviewed all of the
posted examples for terms A-G, select:
(a) your top two puzzlers (i.e., the examples that seem
to cause the most uncertainty or confusion--not necessarily the most obvious or
trite or unnecessary examples, but those that serve, intentionally or not, the useful
purpose of raising questions about the meanings of the terms they're meant to illustrate),
and
(b) your top three standouts (i.e., the examples that
you think are the best of the best, according to the criteria above).
In no more than a sentence or two for each, prepare to explain (a) why or how the puzzlers puzzle you and (b) why your top three standouts are so darn
good. (Note: for both
puzzlers and standouts, you may call attention to your own examples as well as those of
your classmates.) For examples of puzzlers and standouts identified by students in last
fall's class, see the italicized comments at Rhetorical Terms with Examples: Fall
2007 (A-H).
No later than 4:30 this afternoon (Tuesday, March 4), send your nominations (two puzzlers and three standouts) plus brief
explanations for each to the course email address: engl5730@lycos.com. As always,
please send your responses both attached as a Word doc and pasted
into your e-mail message. If you would like credit for completing
this stage of the exercise, please include your name.
Keep in mind that you are evaluating the examples, not the individuals who submitted them
or the film, comedian, politician, poet, song writer, or family relation who created them
in the first place. Make sure, however, that you identify your choices clearly--both
by the names of the terms and the names of the students who submitted them [students'
names are in brackets]. If one person for some reason submitted more than one example
for the same term, copy and paste your example of choice.
After receiving your evaluations, I will post them to the web site and then follow up with
some of my own evaluations. In addition, I'll delete misleading examples,
unnecessary examples (i.e., those that illustrate terms we already know or certainly
should know by now), and unoriginal examples (i.e., those lifted from our own or other
online exercises or glossaries). In short, to aid our study and review of the terms,
I'll eliminate any examples that perplex or that fail to follow the directions.
26 February 2008 (Tuesday)
--Handout. Read carefully:
"The Rise of Rome & the Rhetoric of Cicero"/Imperial Rome &
the Rhetoric of Quintilian"
--Thank You for Arguing. Read carefully:
Chapter 23: Give a Persuasive Talk (pp. 247-259)
Chapter 20: Get Instant Cleverness (pp. 208-225)
--Classical Rhetoric for the
Modern Student: Carefully read pp. 256-276 (discussions of the
exordium and narratio) in Part III, "Arrangement of Material."
--Love Poems. Be prepared to discuss (and squeeze) the following poems in our
Valentine's Day packet:
-"Enigma," by Jessie
Redmon Fauset
-"Wild
nights! Wild nights!" by Emily Dickinson
-"I Am Not Yours" and "Let It Be
Forgotten" by Sara Teasdale
-"The More Loving
One," by W.H. Auden
-"Again and again, however we know
the landscape of love," by
Rainer Maria Rilke
--"I Have a
Dream." Be prepared to discuss the key rhetorical strategies in Dr. King's
speech. (Video and audio can be found at the American Rhetoric
website.)
--GRAMMAR & RHETORICAL TERMS. Please have a good look at Top 24 Grammatical Terms That
We Should Have Learned in School--and let me know if you have any questions about
basic grammar.
--TERMS
EXERCISE (H-Z). From our CLASS PRODUCTIONS page, go to "Rhetorical Terms with Examples:
Fall 2007 (H-Z)," "73
Rhetorical Terms with Examples: 2006--I-Z," "Rhetorical Terms with Examples:
2005--H-Z," and "77
Rhetorical Terms with Examples: F-Z" (contributed by the rhetoric class of 2003):
read the examples and try to define the rhetorical terms they illustrate (then check your
answers by clicking on the terms).
Next, and no later than 4:30 this afternoon (Feb. 26),
send me an e-mail with five different examples you
have found (or created) of any five different terms (from our list
of terms) beginning H through Z. Be
sure to cite the author and title of any poem, song lyric, speech, essay, story, gum
wrapper, movie script, t-shirt, road sign, or novel you quote from. (Again, please
send me the terms both attached as a Word doc and pasted into your
e-mail message.) Obviously, I expect you to provide a fresh example for each of the
five terms, not one that's already been submitted or that appears on another
glossary site.
Your great challenge is to find examples of some of the less obvious (and perhaps more
difficult to remember) terms. If you submit examples of terms that we already know
(such as parable, proverb, and simile), I will deduct points and ridicule you
mercilessly on this web site. (The purpose of this exercise is to come up with fresh
examples that will help you and your classmates understand and remember the
terms.) On the other hand, if you submit particularly imaginative examples for more
challenging terms, I will heap extra points upon you and honor your name. (There will
be prizes for the best work.)
Again, as you're working on the exercise (don't wait till
Tuesday's deadline), please send me an email if you're uncertain about the
meaning of a term or the appropriateness of your example.
The alternative? "And you: friendless, brainless,
helpless, hopeless! Do you want me to send you back to where you were? Unemployed in
Greenland!" (Vizzini's examples of asyndeton, erotesis, and exclamation in The
Princess Bride).
And remember that your evaluations of the A-G examples are due Thursday,
February 28.
Tip:
Looking for some good, fresh examples? Check out the quotation pages at IMDb for your favorite movies. Or skim quotations from a
favorite author or historical figure at the Columbia
World of Quotations. (The examples at Homer Simpson's Figures of
Speech came from online quotation sites--not from avidly watching the program.) Or
help yourself to a favorite beverage and make up some clever examples.
19 February 2008
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student: Carefully read the survey
of Roman rhetoric (primarily works by Cicero and Quintilian) on pages 494-497. Also, read the
discussion of enthymemes and examples on pages 52-62 and of the exordium
(or introduction) on pages 260-270.
--Handout. Read carefully:
-excerpts from Lincoln at Gettysburg, by Garry Wills.
--Online Reading: Sojourner Truth. Read this brief introduction to Sojourner Truth and the two accounts of
her famous "Ain't I a Woman?" speech.
--Squeezing Love Poems. Read the 11 sets of poems on the handout (distributed in
class on Valentine's Day), and then focus on set #1 (the two sonnets by Shakespeare) and any
other two sets in the handout (presumably, poems that you understand and that
interest you). Then, take a pen and "squeeze" these three sets of poems: take
notes (directly on the handout) regarding the ethical, pathetic, and/or logical appeals
and any figurative and stylistic devices you find. In class, we'll discuss the two
Shakespearean sonnets together and then I'll call on you individually to find out what
notes you've made on the poems you've selected. If you have any questions while squeezing,
send me an email over the weekend.
--TERMS
EXERCISE (A-G). From our CLASS PRODUCTIONS page, go to "Rhetorical Terms with Examples:
Fall 2007," "Rhetorical
Terms with Examples: 2005," "77 Rhetorical Terms with
Examples" (rhetoric class of 2003), "66 Rhetorical Terms with
Examples" (class of 2002), and "Examples
of Rhetorical Terms" (class of 2000): read the examples and try to define the
rhetorical terms they illustrate (then check your answers by clicking on the terms).
Next, and no later than 4:30 this afternoon (Feb. 19),
send me an e-mail with five different examples you
have found (or created) of any five different terms (from our list
of terms) beginning A through G
(we'll cover the rest of the alphabet next week). Be sure to cite the author
and title of any poem, song lyric, speech, essay, story, gum wrapper, movie script,
t-shirt, road sign, or novel you quote from. (Please send me the terms both
attached as a Word doc and pasted into your e-mail message.) Obviously, I
expect you to provide a fresh example for each of the five terms, not one that's
already been submitted or that appears on another glossary site.
Your great challenge is to find examples of some of the less obvious (and perhaps more
difficult to remember) terms. If you submit examples of terms that we already know
(such as alliteration and fable), I will deduct points and ridicule you
mercilessly on this web site. (The purpose of this exercise is to come up with fresh
examples that will help you and your classmates understand and remember the
terms.) On the other hand, if you submit particularly imaginative examples for more
challenging terms, I will heap extra points upon you and honor your name. (There will
be prizes for the best work.)
As you're working on the exercise (don't wait till Tuesday), send me an email if
you're uncertain about the meaning of a term or the appropriateness of your example.
I'm counting on you to outshine the young rhetoricians who have preceded you in this
class. As Mikey says in The Goonies, "This is our time, our time!"
(An example, of course, of epizeuxis.)
Tip:
Looking for some good, fresh examples? Check out the quotation pages at IMDb for your favorite movies. Or skim quotations from a
favorite author or historical figure at the Columbia
World of Quotations. (The examples at Homer Simpson's Figures of
Speech came from online quotation sites--not from avidly watching the program.) Or
help yourself to a favorite beverage and make up some clever examples.
14 February 2008
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student: Carefully read the
discussion of connotation on pages 349-351 and of figures of speech on pages 377-411 (skipping "Schemes of Words" on
page 380). Make sure that you know all of the terms introduced by Corbett and Connors that
also appear in our Tool Kit for Rhetorical Analysis. A few things to note:
-disregard anastrophe on pp. 383-84;
-in place of the term epistrophe (p. 391), use the term epiphora;
-disregard the term antimetabole (p. 394), and instead use chiasmus
for both devices on pages 394-395;
-disregard anthimeria on pp. 400-401;
-in place of the term periphrasis (pp. 401-401), use the term circumlocution.
--Thank You for Arguing. Read Chapters 7
and 8, pp. 66-78.
--Handouts. Read carefully:
-The Gettysburg Address, by Abraham Lincoln
-"The Gettysburg Address," by Gilbert Highet
-Richard Lanham's "Descriptive Analysis" (a "lemon squeezer") of the
Gettysburg Address
--BACKGROUND ON THE GETTYSBURG ADDRESS.
Read the preview at NOTES for Feb. 5
and 7 on this topic.
--Online Readings.
Review terms on these pages:
-Figures, Tropes, &
Other Rhetorical Terms
-Definitions of
Rhetoric in Ancient Greece and Rome
-Rhetorical Terms with Examples (Fall 2007): Terms A-G and Terms H-Z.
--Julius Caesar. Continue to study (and be prepared to identify the
various rhetorical strategies and stylistic devices in) the rest of Antony's speeches in
Act Three, scene two, of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. Study our course
page on "Comments on the Rhetoric
of Brutus and Marc Antony in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar." Also,
see the previews and postscripts at last week's NOTES.
12 February 2008
--ONLINE ASSIGNMENT: REVISION & CRITIQUES OF AD ANALYSES. Study the ad analyses (ANALYZING PERSUASIVE APPEALS IN ADVERTISEMENTS: 2008) that you and your colleagues submitted a few weeks ago--all of them (2008
analyses only). The assignment at that time, you'll recall, was simply to do the
following:
Compose a concise and cogent
rhetorical analysis (roughly 200-300 words) of a magazine ad of your choosing (any
ad that contains both images and text), focusing on the specific
ethical, pathetic, and logical appeals. (Examples of such analyses are posted
at Analyzing Persuasive Appeals in
Advertisements: 2000, Analyzing
Persuasive Appeals in Advertisements: 2002, and Analyzing Ads: 2005; some
examples are significantly better than others.) By the start of class on Tuesday:
(1) Send me (at engl5730@lycos.com) a copy of your
analysis (as an attached Word doc).
(2) Bring to class both a hard copy of your word-processed analysis and the ad you've
examined (clipped together).
Now that we've reviewed the basic components of a good rhetorical analysis, learned
several new rhetorical concepts (including enthymemes, examples, maxims, metonymy,
connotation, textual and visual metaphors--and another 40 or so terms), and examined
ethical, pathetic, and logical appeals in greater depth, you should be ready to sharpen
your analysis in a thoughtful revision.
But before doing so, have a good look at these two analyses written by students in the
2006 class:
-Vaseline Skin Lotion (Stephanie
Roberts)
-Corona Light (Lisa Hom)
Notice that both students begin by identifying the magazine in which the ad appeared as
well as the target audience for each ad--i.e., the external rhetorical situation. And
notice that both students keep that audience in mind as they conduct their analyses
(Stephanie uses "we" to identify with that audience; Lisa uses third person,
suggesting that she's not a part of that audience). Notice that both students avoid the
first-person singular: not because "I" is inherently evil, but because in this
assignment it would likely be be irrelevant and distracting. Both students are clearly
aware of the product that's being promoted, both attempt to show relations between details
in the text and visual details, and Lisa (in particular) has clearly spent some time
studying the rhetorical terms and she applies them effectively. Both reports are clearly
written and carefully edited.
By 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 12, send me
an email with two separate Word documents clearly labeled and attached:
Document 1: A thoughtful revision of your
original ad analysis. Cut out deadwood,
including any summary ("Show me") that's not accompanied by analysis ("So
what?"): your readers have the ad in front of them. Identify the rhetorical context:
where the ad appeared and the apparent target audience (which is usually consistent with
the target audience for the magazine). Begin your analysis in your first paragraph (broad
introductions aren't necessary). Be sure to augment your analysis of ethical, pathetic,
and logical appeals with attention to other rhetorical strategies and devices that we've
studied since you composed your draft a few weeks ago. Edit and proofread carefully.
Estimated length: roughly 300 to 400 words.
Document 2: A concise response (150 to 200
words) to any one of the other analyses
posted at ANALYZING PERSUASIVE APPEALS IN
ADVERTISEMENTS: 2008 (i.e, anybody
else's draft but your own). Your goal isn't to dump on a classmate's draft. It's to respond
to that draft with additional observations about rhetorical strategies that you
find in the ad and/or with your own interpretations of strategies that may differ
in some ways (big or small) from points raised in the original analysis. You're welcome (but not required) to work in teams on this short project:
start early, pick a partner, and exchange responses to one another's ads. In this way,
your partner's response may guide your revision of your own work.
5 February 2008
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student:
(a) Carefully re-read pages 71-84 (ethos and pathos) as well as pages 492-494 (on
Aristotle's Rhetoric).
[See ASSIGNMENTS for Jan. 29, below.]
(b) Read pages 52-58 (the enthymeme).
--Handouts. Read carefully:
-Act III, scene 2 of Shakepeare's Julius Caesar, with special attention to
the parallel speeches by Brutus and Antony on the first two pages. Take notes on any
rhetorical strategies and stylistic devices that you recognize.
-Euphemisms for "Killer Words and Phrases" (excerpts from Frank Luntz's book Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear (2006).
Luntz says that his primary goal to is to promote clarity. Do you agree?
--Online Reading (repeated from ASSIGNMENTS for Jan 29,
posted on Jan. 24):
-Excerpts from
Aristotle's Rhetoric, Book I: After reading the introduction to Aristotle in Classical
Rhetoric (pp. 492-494), have a good look at these excerpts from the opening sections of Rhetoric:
Background, 1, 2, and 3. (Stop--about two-thirds of the way down the page--when you reach
section 5: "It may be said that every individual man . . ..")
--Online Reading.
After reading and taking notes on Act III, scene 2 of Julius Caesar, read the
short articles posted at Comments on the
Rhetoric of Brutus and Marc Antony in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar.
--Thank You for Arguing. Read
Chapter 12, "Persuade on Your Own Terms" (pages 108-120).
--Terms Online: As one way of learning some of the trickier terms (and to prepare for an
upcoming online exercise), review the work posted by the class of 2006 at Rhetorical Terms with Examples.
29 January 2008
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Carefully read pages 71-84
(ethos and pathos) as well as pages 492-494 (on
Aristotle's Rhetoric).
--Terms Online: Make sure that you understand and can apply the rhetorical terms covered
on these pages:
-Quiz on Figures of
Speech in Advertising Slogans
-What Is a Metaphor?
-Homer Simpson's
Figures of Speech
-Bdelygmia: The
Perfect Rant
-What Is
Sprezzatura?
-Euphemisms,
Dysphemisms, and Distinctio: Soggy Sweat's Whiskey Speech
--Handouts:
-Senator George Vest's Tribute to His Dog
-Online Marriage Proposals (in conjunction with the excerpt
from Pride & Prejudice in Classical Rhetoric)
--Online Readings:
-Speeches. Listen again to Nixon's
"Checkers speech" (at YouTube), and skim the text of that speech at
the History Place.
-Excerpts from Aristotle's Rhetoric,
Book I: After reading the introduction to
Aristotle in Classical Rhetoric (pp. 492-494), have a good look at these excerpts from the opening sections of Rhetoric:
Background, 1, 2, and 3. (Stop--about two-thirds of the way down the page--when you reach
section 5: "It may be said that every individual man . . ..")
-Metaphor. This week we'll
begin looking at the "master trope," metaphor. To prepare, please
read (or re-read) a few poems and be sure to bring printouts of these poems to class: "Up-Hill";
"Because I could not stop for
Death"; "The Road Not
Taken"; "Making a
Fist"; and "Walking
Back Up Depot Street."
_____________
22 January 2008
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Carefully re-read pages 15-24. Carefully read pages 489-492.
--Plato Handout. Read the introduction to Plato
(pages 16-18), the excerpts from Gorgias, and the excerpts from Phaedrus.
--Online Readings. Make sure that you understand and can apply these common rhetorical terms:
-Top 20 Figures of Speech
-Review Quiz: Top 20
Figures of Speech
--Thank You for Arguing.
Read Chapter 3, "Control the Tense" (pp. 27-37);
Chapter 6, "Make Them Listen" (pp. 56-65); and Chapter 21, "Seize the Occasion" (pp.
226-236).
--AD ANALYSIS. Compose a
concise and cogent rhetorical analysis (roughly 200-300 words) of a magazine ad of your
choosing (any ad that contains both images and text), focusing on the specific
ethical, pathetic, and logical appeals. (Examples of such analyses are posted at Analyzing Persuasive Appeals in
Advertisements: 2000, Analyzing
Persuasive Appeals in Advertisements: 2002, and Analyzing Ads: 2005; some
examples are significantly better than others.) By the start of class on Tuesday:
(1) Send me (at engl5730@lycos.com) a copy of your
analysis (as an attached Word doc).
(2) Bring to class both a hard copy of your word-processed analysis and the ad you've
examined (clipped together).
17 January 2008
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Read pages 17-26.
--Thank You for Arguing.
Read Chapter 5 on ethos and decorum
(pages 46-55) and Chapter 9 (pages 79-90).
15 January 2008
--COURSE OVERVIEW. Survey the main
sections of our course web site, and carefully read the course SYLLABUS. Make sure that before coming
to class (today and every class day) you've visited NOTES and read carefully the postscript
to our last class and the preview of this one.
--Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Read pages 1-17.
--Thank You for Arguing. Read the Introduction (pages 3-11) and Chapter 4 on ethos, pathos, and logos (pages 38-45).
13 January 2008
--No later than 9:00 p.m., please send me an e-mail
(at engl5730@lycos.com) so that I can add your
address to the class e-mail address book. In your e-mail, please let me know
(briefly) your major (English majors, please specify "straight English" or
"Communications") and your career goals (if any).
English 5730 is taught by Dr. Richard Nordquist
Office of Liberal Studies (Solms 211)
Armstrong Atlantic State University
Savannah, Georgia 31419
912/921 5991
e-mail: engl5730@lycos.com

UPDATED
29 April 2008